Tuesday, March 22, 2011

The Weekly Blog, Brought to you by the Busiest Person on Earth

So,
I know I haven't committed myself as much as I should.
But I want to let you readers know that a weekly blog is SO MUCH easier to handle!
And so, I've decided, except for the Summer (yes, it will change depending upon the season, too xD) this is going to be updated weekly. During the Summer?
EVERY DAY!!!!

[Disclaimer: May be too astronomical, physical, and mathematical for stupid people to handle. Please be advised: If your IQ is under 180, brain may explode after reading. Side effects include: headaches, boredom, lack of motivation, obsession with the sciences/mathematics, distraction, and compulsive reading.]

FDA Approved! =P

Tuesday, March 1, 2011

[WHOOPS]

[SYSTEM ONLINE]
[INIT ERROR REPORT: GO]
[DUE TO AN AUTHORITATIVE JUDGMENT BY THE AUTHOR'S PARENTS, THE AUTHOR IS UNABLE TO PROVIDE YOU WITH THE ASTRONOMICAL LOVE THAT THE AUTHOR NORMALLY DOES]
[THE AUTHOR HAS AUTHORIZED SYSTEM TO MAKE SAID UPDATE]
[DUE TO A FAULTY MEMORY AND LOW-POWER-RELATED DATA CORRUPTION, THE GREAT SYSTEM BEFORE YOU IS UNABLE TO UPDATE THIS BLOG IN THE AUTHOR'S PLACE AS REQUESTED]
[IN THE EVENT THAT SAID ACTION IS TAKEN TOMORROW, 1 - 2 DIAGRAMS WILL APPEAR AS WELL AS AN EXPANSE OF LONG WORDS, GRACIOUSLY GIVEN BY NONE OTHER THAN THE FANTASTIC SYSTEM]
[INIT ERROR REPORT: STOP]
[INTERNAL DISCONN: SYSTEM DISCONN]
[SYSTEM OFFLINE]

Friday, February 18, 2011

Admins Wanted!

TMTM is now looking for other.. administrators for this blog.

I’ve come to the conclusion that I can’t do this all by myself, I need someone else to help me with it.

So, I ask you, my friends, to come forward now (or forever hold your peace) if you would like to maybe be part of this awesome project!

Friday, February 11, 2011

A Correlation Plot Brought to You From NASA!

One of the corrolation diagrams featured on the iPod Touch and iPhone App “Exoplanet”.

The Host Star Metallicity represents the exoplanets’ stars’ (exoplanets meaning the planets outside our solar system) metallicity, meaning the amount of light which is given off of the star itself. The Eccentricity represents the host stars’ movement: How many degrees it moves away from a center point.

Each red dot represents one host star of an exoplanet.

Capture

Monday, February 7, 2011

Back in Time: A History of the Moon (2008)

Unlocking The Mystery Of The Moon
Astrophysicists Search Skies For A Moon Like Earth's

May 1, 2008 — Astrophysicists used the Spitzer Space Telescope to scan a cluster of about 500 stars for evidence of a collision similar to the one that produced Earth's moon. The telescope searches in the infrared part of the spectrum, which allows researchers to search for the dust clouds created by massive collisions. The surface area of the dust would absorb light from the star and become warm. Researchers hypothesize that a maximum of five to ten percent of all moons form in the way that the Earth's did.

The moon is the brightest light in the night sky. We've sent space missions there, people have written countless songs and poems about it and now, astrophysicists are providing new insight on how the Earth's moon was created and what makes it special.

"Well, the moon is certainly the most dramatic thing in the sky, so I'm sure people have had ideas about where it came from the beginning," George Rieke, Ph.D., an astrophysicist at the University of Arizona in Tucson, Ariz., told Ivanhoe.

Dr. Rieke says our moon is unique -- formed by a massive collision in space. "There was another planet about the size of Mars that was on a disastrous orbit across the Earth's orbit and so the Earth and this other planet ran into each other," he says.

It happened 30 to 50 million years after the formation of the sun. "It was a huge collision that threw dust and debris out into space and some of that material somehow reassembled and orbited around the Earth and eventually built up a moon," Dr. Rieke explained.

Now, an infrared detector like this one on NASA's Spitzer Telescope is giving University of Arizona astrophysicists a wealth of new information from space. Researchers looked for evidence of dust debris around 430-million-year-old stars. Surprisingly, only one star was surrounded by dust, revealing that no other moon was formed like or since ours. "Nothing like that occurred around any of the other planets in our solar system," Dr. Rieke said.

Scientists believe our moon set the stage for life on earth as we know it. But it could have been very different. "It could have been, if the other planet was a little bit bigger that it would have just destroyed the Earth and there wouldn't be any Earth left," Dr. Rieke explained.

You may never look at the moon quite the same way again. "We should be a lot more thankful when we go out at night and find our way around through the full moonlight or just admire what it looks like," Dr. Rieke said. Astrophysicists believe that moons like the Earth's form in only five to ten percent of planetary systems in our universe.

THE FORMATION OF THE MOON: The Earth’s moon formed just 30 to 50 million years after the sun was formed, when an object the size of Mars collided with Earth, and released a giant cloud of dust along with the moon. After examining a cluster of about 500 stars with the Spitzer Space Telescope, the researchers found very little evidence of collisions. If there had been such an event, large amounts of dust would have remained in the solar system long after the creation of a moon. The telescope would have indirectly observed pieces of dust that had absorbed light from the star in their solar system and become warmer than the surroundings.

ABOUT THE SPITZER TELESCOPE: The Spitzer Space Telescope was launched on August 25, 2003. Spitzer detects the infrared energy radiated by objects in space. Most of this infrared radiation is blocked by the Earth's atmosphere and cannot be observed from the ground. Spitzer allows us to peer into regions of space that are hidden from optical telescopes. Many areas of space are filled with vast, dense clouds of gas and dust that block our view. Infrared light however can penetrate these clouds, allowing us to peer into regions of star formation, the centers of galaxies, and into newly forming planetary systems. Infrared also brings us information about the cooler objects in space, such as smaller stars which are too dim to be detected by their visible light, extrasolar planets, and giant molecular clouds.

Share Blog  Print Bookmark

Oh Noes!!!!!!

NOTICE: Astronomy Picture of the Day will be down for a day or two. Sorry :( * will be uploading articles n stuff still, so stay tuned!!!

D;

Sunday, February 6, 2011

Astronomy Picture of the Day

On January 31st, 2011 NASA’s Cassini sent images of Saturn’s moons. This was one of them.

image

Saturday, February 5, 2011

Astronomy Picture of the Day

A perfect photograph of the galaxy NGC 3621 from Europe.

image

Astronomy Picture of the Day

The Moon and Venus Over Switzerland


See Explanation.  Clicking on the picture will download<br />the highest resolution version available.

Credit & Copyright: David Kaplan

The Six-Planet Kepler System

image

NASA Finds Six-Planet System Within the ‘Habitable Zone’ (Featured Article)

NASA Finds Earth-Size Planet Candidates in Habitable Zone, Six Planet System

ScienceDaily (Feb. 2, 2011) — NASA's Kepler mission has discovered its first Earth-size planet candidates and its first candidates in the habitable zone, a region where liquid water could exist on a planet's surface. Five of the potential planets are near Earth-size and orbit in the habitable zone of smaller, cooler stars than our sun.

Candidates require follow-up observations to verify they are actual planets. Kepler also found six confirmed planets orbiting a sun-like star, Kepler-11. This is the largest group of transiting planets orbiting a single star yet discovered outside our solar system.

"In one generation we have gone from extraterrestrial planets being a mainstay of science fiction, to the present, where Kepler has helped turn science fiction into today's reality," said NASA Administrator Charles Bolden. "These discoveries underscore the importance of NASA's science missions, which consistently increase understanding of our place in the cosmos."

The discoveries are part of several hundred new planet candidates identified in new Kepler mission science data, released on Feb. 1. The findings increase the number of planet candidates identified by Kepler to-date to 1,235. Of these, 68 are approximately Earth-size; 288 are super-Earth-size; 662 are Neptune-size; 165 are the size of Jupiter and 19 are larger than Jupiter.

Of the 54 new planet candidates found in the habitable zone, five are near Earth-sized. The remaining 49 habitable zone candidates range from super-Earth size -- up to twice the size of Earth -- to larger than Jupiter.

The findings are based on the results of observations conducted May 12 to Sept. 17, 2009, of more than 156,000 stars in Kepler's field of view, which covers approximately 1/400 of the sky.

"The fact that we've found so many planet candidates in such a tiny fraction of the sky suggests there are countless planets orbiting sun-like stars in our galaxy," said William Borucki of NASA's Ames Research Center in Moffett Field, Calif., the mission's science principal investigator. "We went from zero to 68 Earth-sized planet candidates and zero to 54 candidates in the habitable zone, some of which could have moons with liquid water."

Among the stars with planetary candidates, 170 show evidence of multiple planetary candidates. Kepler-11, located approximately 2,000 light years from Earth, is the most tightly packed planetary system yet discovered. All six of its confirmed planets have orbits smaller than Venus, and five of the six have orbits smaller than Mercury's. The only other star with more than one confirmed transiting planet is Kepler-9, which has three. The Kepler-11 findings will be published in the Feb. 3 issue of the journal Nature.

"Kepler-11 is a remarkable system whose architecture and dynamics provide clues about its formation," said Jack Lissauer, a planetary scientist and Kepler science team member at Ames. "These six planets are mixtures of rock and gases, possibly including water. The rocky material accounts for most of the planets' mass, while the gas takes up most of their volume. By measuring the sizes and masses of the five inner planets, we determined they are among the lowest mass confirmed planets beyond our solar system."

All of the planets orbiting Kepler-11 are larger than Earth, with the largest ones being comparable in size to Uranus and Neptune. The innermost planet, Kepler-11b, is ten times closer to its star than Earth is to the sun. Moving outward, the other planets are Kepler-11c, Kepler-11d, Kepler-11e, Kepler-11f, and the outermost planet, Kepler-11g, which is half as far from its star as Earth is from the sun.

The planets Kepler-11d, Kepler-11e and Kepler-11f have a significant amount of light gas, which indicates that they formed within a few million years of the system's formation.

"The historic milestones Kepler makes with each new discovery will determine the course of every exoplanet mission to follow," said Douglas Hudgins, Kepler program scientist at NASA Headquarters in Washington.

Kepler, a space telescope, looks for planet signatures by measuring tiny decreases in the brightness of stars caused by planets crossing in front of them. This is known as a transit.

Since transits of planets in the habitable zone of sun-like stars occur about once a year and require three transits for verification, it is expected to take three years to locate and verify Earth-size planets orbiting sun-like stars.

The Kepler science team uses ground-based telescopes and the Spitzer Space Telescope to review observations on planetary candidates and other objects of interest the spacecraft finds.

The star field that Kepler observes in the constellations Cygnus and Lyra can only be seen from ground-based observatories in spring through early fall. The data from these other observations help determine which candidates can be validated as planets.

For more information about the Kepler mission, visit: http://www.nasa.gov/kepler

Story Source:

The above story is reprinted (with editorial adaptations by ScienceDaily staff) from materials provided by NASA.

Thursday, February 3, 2011

Cyclone Yasi

image

Cyclone Yasi spotted by NASA hitting Australia today

Cyclone Yasi Hits Australia, Spotted by NASA (Featured Article)

NASA Aqua Satellite Sees Powerful Cyclone Yasi Make Landfall in Queensland, Australia

ScienceDaily (Feb. 2, 2011) — NASA's Aqua satellite captured visible and infrared imagery of powerful Cyclone Yasi as it was making landfall in Queensland. The center of the monster cyclone Yasi made landfall on Australia's northeastern coast early Thursday (Australia local time) bringing heavy rainfall, severe winds and storm surge.

On Feb. 2 at 03:35 UTC/1:35 p.m. Australia local time, the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) instrument on NASA's Aqua satellite captured a visible image of Cyclone Yasi before it made landfall in Queensland, Australia. The eye of the cyclone was very clear and indicative of the power of this tropical cyclone. Damaged buildings, downed trees and power outages have been reported.

A Cyclone Warning is still in effect today for coastal and island communities from Cooktown to Proserpine, and west inland to the Northern Territory border. The Cyclone Warning was cancelled between Cape Flattery and Cooktown. The Australian Bureau of meteorology warned that flooding rains between Cairns and Proserpine will gradually move inland as Yasi tracks to the west. Flood Warnings are in effect for several rivers between Cairns and MacKay

At 03:29 UTC/1:29 p.m. Australia local time on February 2 (10:29 p.m. EST, Feb. 1), the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) instrument captured an infrared image of Cyclone Yasi as its center was just southeast of Willis Island. The infrared image showed powerful thunderstorms with strong convection and heavy rainfall surrounding a large area around a very clear eye. The temperatures in the cloud tops were as cold as or colder than -63 Fahrenheit (-52 Celsius).

Tropical Cyclone Yasi was making landfall as a powerful Category Four cyclone with maximum sustained winds near 135 knots (155 mph/ 250 kmh) on Feb. 2, at 1500 UTC (10 a.m. EST/ 1 a.m. Australia local time on Feb. 3). It was located about 245 miles east of Cairns near 17.5 South and 146.8 East and moving west-southwest near 13 knots (15 mph/ 24 kmh). Maximum waveheights associated with Yasi were 42 feet (~13 meters) in the Coral Sea.

The automated Bureau of Meteorology (BoM) weather station on Willis Island provided amazing data this morning as Cyclone Yasi swept past. Willis Island is located east of Queensland, Australia. Rainfall exceeded 60 mm (2.36 inches) in one hour and pressure had fallen to near 938 millibars. Windspeed peaked at 75 knots (86 mph/138 kmh) before the equipment stopped working.

As Yasi made landfall and swept inland, Cairns, located to the north of Townsville, recorded a low reading of atmospheric pressure near 983 millibars. Rainfall was 16 mm (0.6 inch) in one hour, and maximum sustained winds were recorded as high as 34 knots (39 mph/63 kmh).

At 3 a.m. local time, the center of Severe Tropical Cyclone Yasi had moved inland and was located near 18.1 South and 145.4 East. It was moving west-southwest near 33 kmh (20 mph) and had a minimum central pressure of 941 millibars. The storm is forecast to weaken and dissipate within 48 hours.

Story Source:

The above story is reprinted (with editorial adaptations by ScienceDaily staff) from materials provided by NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, via EurekAlert!, a service of AAAS.

Share Blog Cite

Print Bookmark Email

Tuesday, February 1, 2011

Astronomy Picture of the Day

Galaxy NGC 4826 and M46 collide to give 4826 a ‘black eye’

Galaxy NGC 4826 Feb 1

Russia Loses its Satellite???? (Featured Article)

Russia has reportedly lost contact with its newest military satellite just hours after launching it into space today (Feb. 1), according to Russian reports.

The satellite, called Geo-IK-2, blasted off atop a three-stage Rocket booster from Russia's northern Plesetsk Cosmodrome at about 5 p.m. Moscow Time (9 a.m. EST, 1400 GMT). But just two hours after liftoff, the satellite went missing, according to Russia's Itar-Tass and Interfax news agencies.

"There is no contact with the satellite," Russia's Interfax-AVN news service quoted an unnamed Russian space industry source as saying.

The Geo-IK-2 spacecraft is reportedly an Earth-observation satellite designed to build three-dimensional maps to aid the Russian military. It was expected to launch into a circular orbit about 600 miles (1,000 km) above the Earth, according to Agence France-Press.

But the satellite did not enter the proper orbit, with some Russian reports suggesting its current flight path brings it as low as 205 miles (330 km) above the ground, AFP reported.

The satellite launch failure comes just five weeks after Russian President Dmitry Medvedev fired two top-ranking space officials and reprimanded Anatoly Perminov, chief of Russia's Federal Space Agency, following the botched launch of a Proton rocket carrying three new navigation satellites.

In the Dec. 5 launch failure, the Proton rocket's Block DM-3 upper stage was loaded with too much fuel. The basic miscalculation sent the Proton rocket off course. The new Glonass-M navigation satellites onboard that rocket crashed into the Pacific Ocean north of Hawaii.

Today's launch failure, however, occurred on a different type of rocket.

The Rocket booster design is based on components built for Russia's SS-16 intercontinental ballistic missiles. It has two core stages topped with a Breeze-KM upper stage used to send satellite payloads into their final orbits.

According to Interfax, Russia's Defense Ministry is forming a commission to investigate today's launch failure. Russia's Federal Space Agency will form part of that commission, the news agency stated.

Source of Original Article: SPACE.com

Monday, January 31, 2011

Astronomy Picture of the Day

Astronaut Russell L. Schweickart is preparing for the Apollo 9 launch, in February 1969

Apollo 9 Launch February 1969

Sunday, January 30, 2011

Saturday, January 29, 2011

Astronomy Picture of the Day

A Picture of Galaxy NGC 7293 - “The Helix Nebula”

The Helix Nebula - NGC 7293

Featured Article!

Global Eruption Rocks the Sun: Scientists Re-Evaluate Ideas About Solar Storms

ScienceDaily (Jan. 28, 2011) — On August 1, 2010, an entire hemisphere of the sun erupted. Filaments of magnetism snapped and exploded, shock waves raced across the stellar surface, billion-ton clouds of hot gas billowed into space. Astronomers knew they had witnessed something big.

It was so big, it may have shattered old ideas about solar activity.

"The August 1st event really opened our eyes," says Karel Schrijver of Lockheed Martin's Solar and Astrophysics Lab in Palo Alto, CA. "We see that solar storms can be global events, playing out on scales we scarcely imagined before."

For the past three months, Schrijver has been working with fellow Lockheed-Martin solar physicist Alan Title to understand what happened during the "Great Eruption." They had plenty of data: The event was recorded in unprecedented detail by NASA's Solar Dynamics Observatory and twin STEREO spacecraft. With several colleagues present to offer commentary, they outlined their findings at a recent press conference at the American Geophysical Union meeting in San Francisco.

Explosions on the sun are not localized or isolated events, they announced. Instead, solar activity is interconnected by magnetism over breathtaking distances. Solar flares, tsunamis, coronal mass ejections--they can go off all at once, hundreds of thousands of miles apart, in a dizzyingly-complex concert of violence.

"To predict eruptions we can no longer focus on the magnetic fields of isolated active regions," says Title, "we have to know the surface magnetic field of practically the entire sun."

This revelation increases the work load for space weather forecasters, but it also increases the potential accuracy of their forecasts.

"The whole-sun approach could lead to breakthroughs in predicting solar activity," commented Rodney Viereck of NOAA's Space Weather Prediction Center in Boulder, CO. "This in turn would provide improved forecasts to our customers such as electric power grid operators and commercial airlines, who could take action to protect their systems and ensure the safety of passengers and crew."

In a paper they prepared for the Journal of Geophysical Research (JGR), Schrijver and Title broke down the Great Eruption into more than a dozen significant shock waves, flares, filament eruptions, and CMEs spanning 180 degrees of solar longitude and 28 hours of time. At first it seemed to be a cacophony of disorder until they plotted the events on a map of the sun's magnetic field:

Title describes the Eureka! moment: "We saw that all the events of substantial coronal activity were connected by a wide-ranging system of separatrices, separators, and quasi-separatrix layers." A "separatrix" is a magnetic fault zone where small changes in surrounding plasma currents can set off big electromagnetic storms.

Researchers have long suspected this kind of magnetic connection was possible. "The notion of 'sympathetic' flares goes back at least three quarters of a century," they wrote in their JGR paper. Sometimes observers would see flares going off one after another--like popcorn--but it was impossible to prove a link between them. Arguments in favor of cause and effect were statistical and often full of doubt.

"For this kind of work, SDO and STEREO are game-changers," says Lika Guhathakurta, NASA's Living with a Star Program Scientist. "Together, the three spacecraft monitor 97% of the sun, allowing researchers to see connections that they could only guess at in the past."

To wit, barely two-thirds of the August event was visible from Earth, yet all of it could be seen by the SDO-STEREO fleet. Moreover, SDO's measurements of the sun's magnetic field revealed direct connections between the various components of the Great Eruption -- no statistics required.

Much remains to be done. "We're still sorting out cause and effect," says Schrijver. "Was the event one big chain reaction, in which one eruption triggered another--bang, bang, bang!--in sequence? Or did everything go off together as a consequence of some greater change in the sun's global magnetic field?"

Further analysis may yet reveal the underlying trigger; for now, the team is still wrapping their minds around the global character of solar activity. One commentator recalled the old adage of three blind men describing an elephant--one by feeling the trunk, one by holding the tail, and another by sniffing a toenail. Studying the sun one sunspot at a time may be just as limiting.

"Not all eruptions are going to be global," notes Guhathakurta. "But the global character of solar activity can no longer be ignored."

Story Source:

The above story is reprinted (with editorial adaptations by ScienceDaily staff) from materials provided by NASA. The original article was written by Dr. Tony Phillips.

Link: http://www.sciencedaily.com­ /releases/2010/12/101213154631.htm

Friday, January 28, 2011

Astronomy Picture of the Day

A Green Flash of Light Appeared over the Sun the Morning of January 4th in Europe

Green Flash from the Sun January 4th

Thursday, January 27, 2011

Astronomy Picture of the Day

A Picture from the Hubble Telescope of Galaxy NGC 6946 - “The Fireworks Galaxy”

The Fireworks Galaxy NGC 6946 10 million lightyears away

Wednesday, January 26, 2011

Tuesday, January 25, 2011

Astronomy Picture of the Day

An artist’s impression of what the lunar eclipse looked like at the beginning of January

January 2nd Eclipsed Earth

Monday, January 24, 2011

Astronomy Picture of the Day

A beautiful sun halo behind Stockholm, Sweden.

The Sun Halo behind Stockholm Sweden

The New Blog is Here!!!!

Welcome to The Modern Time Machine version 2!

The NEW Features:

*Astronomy Picture of the Day

*Videos

and much, much more.

We’re going to have featured articles on here every so often, so check in to see the newest updates on NASA, Science Daily.org, and other sources!

PLUS:

If you’d like your article published on here, send the link to me at: bernadette.punk@gmail.com

Sunday, January 23, 2011

2 Days Until TMTM Re-Launches!

What I’ve been setting up for the new blog:

1. Astronomy picture of the day

2. “Featured Articles” page

3. “Videos” page

4. Latest News (under featured articles and videos)

5. More Links

And that’s about it for now!

I’ll keep you guys posted, <3 Maddy

Tuesday, January 18, 2011

New Blog Launch Date!!!!

It's finally coming! The new and improved Modern Time Machine, with lots of new features, such as Astronomy Picture of the Day, videos, Featured Articles, and much more. All this will be coming on:

January 25th, 2011

Sunday, January 9, 2011

Blogging From an iPod Touch 4…..

Hey guys so thanks to my new iPod i will probably be uploading nearly everything from updates on NASA, Stephen Hawking, and other things I normally go blah blah blah about. However, I am recreating how I write this blog. I need to make my posts shorter and have more pictures. LOL. Anyways, what a great way to start a brand new year! And while you wait for the next update, why don’t you look at the different landing spots that NASA sent the Apollo’s up to:

               NASA 33

Monday, January 3, 2011